Now,
where did I put my drink.... you see my days are boring, long, and
mostly uneventful.... there's only one good way I know how to deal
with it: drink, and to
read. But every now and
again I need to write. And well, I've been fiddling around here and
there in my brain, here
and there, where there
are a number of ideas which like peas are snugged away
ready to snug back up,
and in time pierce the membrane so I can pluck em up and stick em
in my gob, to
spit them back into the
world...
Anyway;
I meant
to conduct
an experiment, and, now
that I have your basic attention, whether or not you
keep it and don't let your head sour......
I want to assume that anything is possible in this rather stupid-mad but nevertheless genius universe,
this old thingery that we, as sentient beings, must pay pitch our pitiful pesos intto... let me just get to the main point.
1.
The 'Alderaan' or 'Space' Principle is active in such and such a sense that the very possibility of the existence of a Star
Wars 'universe'... indicates the possibility that Star
Wars actually existed! Yes. You heard me right. As
a philosophical and scientific
dilettante,
I am presuming to posit the fantasization of the Star Wars universe is
itself based ultimately
in the microbial
mind spores which have emanated from beyond,
through
the intergalactic space channels which pollinate our various island universes.
Let
me qualify this with a
reminder of the already proposed theory of Panspermia. Briefly
this
posits
that life in our solar system (Nexus Plexus from
here on out)
could have
been produced through various nebular seedlings derived
from
the ancient cosmic soil— of
which
I dare say humans would have very little true
historical
reckoning (though
I'm
no scientist,
some even call me a quack)—
and thus the Panspermia Theory is the hypothesis of intragalactic ~ via space rock trajectories ~ cosmic life, whose interseeding dynamics being one, but not the only, possible origins of life.
Now to leap a little bit, if we presume that every
little beadlet of consciousness has some potential value in this sea
we call the Nexus Plexus, in the sense that even a thought, whilst
alone in the desert of the rock, is in fact itself a butterfly rocking of that rock, through the thought of thought— then we can presume at least that the
intercosmic spaces between many celestial bodies have, eventually,
some sort of impact on one another, granted that entropy doesn't
destroy it all by the spread of absolute void. (Speaking of your sex
life...!)
Yet
there
are many reasons to argue against this proposition, mainly that the
mind is only an emergent phenomena which depends upon a
fundamentally
biological
functioning, and so 'mind
spores' would
just
be
a grotesque idealization; however, for the sake of imagination we
will hold the idea as potentially possible. However, in a more realistic
sense we needn't rely on 'mind spores' at all, for in this theory of
intergalactic
life-seeding, as long as a biological
bacterium (or, a basic life organism) is able to traverse and survive the intergalactic recesses
and
penetrate successfully a new planetary 'ovum,' then the
same genetically evolutionary seed may begin again.
This, of course, is a huge argumentary leap, because there's no reason to think that a simple genetic framework could unravel in the same way, in the end producing a similar intelligent, civilization-capable species-planet. But speaking as a gardener, it is more important to plant seeds and develop life then to expect an Eden, and I think possibility is the essence of the panspermia hypothesis.
With
that said -- - - - - - - - - - the hypothesis contained in the
Alderaan Principle is all to say that once the mother strain
begins
taking off
in a suitable new environment, and undergoes a fresh round of
evolution,
it has the possibility of generating a
genetically
familial
offshoot of the
base
evolutionary complex. In the Alderaan Principle enough material is
supposed to have been accumulated in a collective genetic colony to
configure a parallel planetary gene pool (I would say though that
this probably is unlikely and most likely would not match up with
genuine, rigorous, and scientifically supported evolutionary theory).
Thus while the evolutionary transplant will express
itself
uniquely in its adaptation
to
novel circumstances, the same evolutionary essentials—
the not quite but more or less universal phenomenological-biological
structure—
will
develop a sister genealogy that is
latent
within this fresh seed. So when a new system is seeded and life opens
up a new chapter upon itself, the succeeding and preceding
genealogies are connected and related to each other through an
absolute familiarity - in the sense as the parent and the child are
one and the same cheese.
Thus
when Star Wars impregnated our semen we watch "Star Wars"
as a science "fiction" that was spawned out of some
"nerd's" mind but in reality the "spore" of the
"idea" which "Lucas" pushed out his placenta was
in fact just a mirroring of the basic fundamental cosmic "essence"
named "Pringle."
3.?
The
question might arise as to why the Star Wars universe appears
to be
diametrically
opposite
to
earth civilization;
but
actually, if you think about it,.........................
and in evolution's
many ages...
there may
be
an extreme differentiation in content while
the form remains more determined.
That is, one often wonders why in the Star Wars galaxy the prime
weapon is lazer machines;
but one might
be neglecting
to consider that our own
history
may
have unraveled along
a
completely alien
trajectory which was brought forth from a
completely different technological paradigm.
It takes imagining and a
willing
dismissal of any
hard
historical determinism, an emphasis on innovative
flukes,
chance, anomaly, and
the underlying pliableness of evolution itself, in order to see how
we
may have developed on a more 'enlightened' technological wavelength.
Naturally if the previous civilized galactic system which included
thousand of different, cooperating species and only managed to self
annihilate itself after eons of political experiments, its
technological apparati were based upon a different and
seemingly less violent lineage. (Except when the Death Star began
murdering everything)
Some
technotheorists may argue that technology has a reductive tendency to
become more powerful and powerful and that the tendency towards
maximum automation, integrated systems, creative/destructive
capacity,etc, is an inherent tendency, but aside from the fact that
many cultures and species naturally shun excess of technocracy.......
may they be at peace
2.
Ah! Ive fallen into drink
again! Bloody heaven, this is not fun. But necessary. So I
say, in my stupid ponderance state, come now. The philosophy of the
micro-macro and the cosm— it is evident as the suds in my brain of course? There is a simple
principle which is easily translatable between cultures . . .
Im drunk as heaven but, I oublietted a lot a shit it's insane and stupid... who
our spiritual spacemoniker , having
dried up , foggied. . . . . blind . . . . . ..... .....